Pop Pov

Menu

Decisionmaking by Households

  • 2011
  • Working Paper
Hotz, Joseph V.; Peet, Evan & Thomas, Duncan

Publisher/Institution: Duke University

Abstract: Understanding how individuals within households combine different needs, aspirations and preferences in the allocation of resources remains a key unresolved issue in models of family behavior in the population sciences. Using specially- designed population-level longitudinal survey data from Indonesia, we test models of co-operative decision-making by households. We validate our model by establishing that the behavior of single-adult households is consistent with predictions from economic models of individual choice and may be treated as a “unitary” decision- maker. In households with more than one adult, not only are the predictions of the unitary model rejected, but we also reject the predictions of a model that assumes household resource allocations are Pareto efficient. To interpret this evidence, we explore decision-making in the face of adversity. In the face of shocks, single-adult households tend to reach out to others whereas multiple-adult households tend to consolidate decision-making authority. Decision-making by households depends not only on the characteristics of members and their bargaining power but also the environment in which those decisions are made.

Resources

PopPov on Twitter

Decisionmaking by Households

  • 2011
  • Working Paper
Hotz, Joseph V.; Peet, Evan & Thomas, Duncan

Publisher/Institution: Duke University

Abstract: Understanding how individuals within households combine different needs, aspirations and preferences in the allocation of resources remains a key unresolved issue in models of family behavior in the population sciences. Using specially- designed population-level longitudinal survey data from Indonesia, we test models of co-operative decision-making by households. We validate our model by establishing that the behavior of single-adult households is consistent with predictions from economic models of individual choice and may be treated as a “unitary” decision- maker. In households with more than one adult, not only are the predictions of the unitary model rejected, but we also reject the predictions of a model that assumes household resource allocations are Pareto efficient. To interpret this evidence, we explore decision-making in the face of adversity. In the face of shocks, single-adult households tend to reach out to others whereas multiple-adult households tend to consolidate decision-making authority. Decision-making by households depends not only on the characteristics of members and their bargaining power but also the environment in which those decisions are made.

Resources

PopPov on Twitter